Proctor additionally requested the pathologist if the pinnacle trauma may have been brought about by means of a baseball bat, consistent with his notes within the document. She stated no, he wrote, however then when requested if a bat being held out the window of a transferring car may have brought about the similar harm, she stated, ‘Smartly, I assume it is conceivable.’”
She also referred to as her findings “initial,” the document persisted, and informed Proctor that it was once as much as him to determine what, precisely, hit Stephen.
Proctor additionally famous within the MAIT document that Hampton County Coroner Ernie Washington—who, in keeping with the document, was once a few of the investigators who noticed Stephen’s frame on the scene of the incident—informed him on Aug. 18, 2015, that he disagreed with the realization that Stephen was once hit by means of a transferring car.
(Presnell, who’s now director of the pathology division on the Scientific College of South Carolina, has now not commented at the renewed scrutiny of her findings within the Smith case, however some other physician she helped teach informed The State final week that coroners are those who discuss publicly and pathologists do not most often touch upon instances except they are known as to testify in court docket.)
Leave a Reply